|
Trade facilitation is about providing an environment
for trade and transport that reduces the cost of international trade
transactions. For landlocked and transit developing countries transaction
costs can be excessive, often pricing exports out of the international
market and significantly increasing the costs of imported goods. Reduced
transport availability and excessive transport and trade-related costs can
thus constitute major barriers to foreign markets and to an effective
integration of landlocked developing countries in the global economy.
Efficient trade facilitation therefore leads to better trade integration
and stimulates local and international investment.
Based on the UNCTAD issue note prepared for this
Roundtable, the Chairman indicated main areas that call for improvement,
particularly in the context of landlocked and transit developing
countries: (1) Regional transport corridors can play a major role in
facilitating transit transport but require a consensus between countries
on common rules and standards; (2) Regarding Infrastructure, countries
should make every effort to construct "missing links" in
regional transport networks and to encourage competition between transport
modes; (3) Transport policies should promote the integration of local
transport operators into global transport systems allowing them to take
advantage of advanced technologies and operating practices; (4)
Partnerships among trading and transport agents, private and public, can
improve trade management.
The Minister of Transport from the Islamic Republic of
Iran highlighted the priority being given to the development of new
transit corridors serving both the international transport needs of
neighbouring countries as well as the national transport needs supporting
local economic development along these corridors. The new North-South
transit corridor will provide a much cheaper sea-access route for Central
Asian countries than existing options. The Minister stressed his
Government was actively seeking the participation of foreign investors in
these developments.
The meeting noted that a number of international
institutions and donors are giving increasing attention to trade
facilitation initiatives. This situation requires multilateral, regional
and sub-regional coordination in order to secure the efficient
implementation of trade facilitation programmes. These programmes need to
cover the concerns of different sectors of the national economy, in
particular Customs, Commerce, Transport and Security. Stakeholders are not
only public institutions but also private trade and transport companies
and individuals that may be affected by Government's policies and actions.
The programmes need therefore to be comprehensive and coherent to secure
tangible benefits within a reasonable time frame. Furthermore, advantage
should be taken from the expertise of regional development organizations
that can tailor global initiatives into regional solutions.
The meeting also noted the need for building the
management capacity of public administrations to better adapt
internationally-agreed trade and transport instruments and commercial best
practices. The experience from developed countries shows that this
endeavour requires considerable time and resources. Equally there was a
need to strengthen the commercial capabilities of national service
suppliers and to increase the competitiveness of the transport services
sector. Partnerships with the foreign private sector may offer the
possibility to improve these services.
The panel included representatives of four
international organizations, namely the World Customs Organization, the UN
Economic Commission for Europe, the UN Conference on Trade and Development
and the World Bank. In a coordinated and single presentation, the four
organizations delivered a unified message. They observed that
institutional instruments (e.g. the revised Customs Kyoto Convention,
UNECE recommendations) have been developed; that a number of diagnostic
methodologies related to Customs, trade and transport have been
established, and that information technology and specific tools (e.g.
ASYCUDA and ACIS) are available. However, trade facilitation is not just
about standards and technology, it is equally about rationalizing and
integrating business and administrative processes. While international
organizations and donors can assist countries, it is up to their
Governments to effectively implement changes. This calls for a strong and
continuous political will, supported by appropriate facilitation
mechanisms (e.g. facilitation bodies, clusters, etc.), at national and
sub-regional levels.
The meeting also referred to the situation in the
Central Asian region for which, in most of the countries, the complexity
of international trade and transport is relatively new. Participants and
panellists made specific mentions of the excessive bureaucracy the
outdated or -sometimes- inexistent regulations, the lack of harmonization
of codes, procedures, and documents both at national and regional levels.
Some participants commented on their programmes and activities to improve
this situation. A panellist also indicated that the present capacity of
local providers of international transport services was limited.
Increasing the competitiveness of this sector and fostering partnerships
with foreign operators would stimulate trade and development.
The Roundtable concluded that more efficient trade
facilitation has high economic benefits. Particularly in landlocked
countries, it can be a crucial element for increased trade. Trade
facilitation is also perceived as a factor of good governance and will
stimulate both national and foreign direct investment. The development of
international transport corridors is recognized as high priority. They not
only benefit landlocked countries but are also "win-win"
investment for transit countries when they are linked to in-country
investment and growth along the corridors. Finally, the discussion on
trade facilitation was considered timely, given the fact that the
international community will have to decide, at Cancun, in two-week time,
whether trade facilitation rules should be negotiated at WTO.
|
Round-table
programme,
speakers and topics
28 August 2003
15h-18h
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman |
Ambassador M. Meyer,
Switzerland
|
|
|
|
|
Introductory note
|
|
|
Panelists
|
|
|
|
Facilitation of movement of
goods along transit corridors
|
|
|
|
H.E. Mr. Ahmad
Khorram,
Minister of Roads and Transportation of the Islamic Republic of
Iran**
|
|
|
|
H.E. Mr. Andruale
Awuzu,**
Minister of State for Transport, Uganda
|
|
|
Regional initiatives to
improve transit operations
|
|
|
|
European Commission DG
Development** (Donors perspective)
|
|
|
|
Mr. P. Pieper, Pragma
Corp.** (USAID) (Donors perspective)
|
|
|
|
Mr. R. Salinas, National
Coordinator, Integration of the Infrastructure in the Region of
South America** (IIRSA)
|
|
|
Transit transport operators
perspective
|
|
|
|
Mr. R.
Stiers, General
Manager, Ahlers/Astros Logistics,** Antwerp
|
|
|
Global approaches to trade
facilitation
|
|
|
|
Mr. K.
Mikuriya, Deputy
Secretary General, WCO**
|
|
|
|
Mr. H.
Hansell, Deputy
Director, Trade Division,
UNECE**
|
|
|
|
Mr. P. Faust, Head, Trade
Logistics Branch, UNCTAD
|
|
|
|
Mr. M.
Zarnowiecki, Senior
Regional Coordinator, World
Bank**
|
|
Panel presentations were followed by a general discussion of transit trade facilitation
problems and solutions. |
An issue note was made available to the participants with
proposals on capacity building elements to plan and implement trade
facilitation programmes in the context of transit transport corridors. (UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/2003/2)
The note deals with available institutional, technological and
framework solutions, including human resources and management capacity
components. It is divided into three main parts. The first one discusses
the assessment of transport and trade facilitation needs and priorities
and how to ensure that transport and trade facilitation measures are made
suitable for the country or region concerned. The second part deals with
an overview of the variety of solutions to be taken into account based on
an analysis of non-physical barriers affecting trade and transport
operations of landlocked countries. The third part deals with some
possible institutional mechanisms to take the lead in the design of
transport and trade facilitation programmes through concerted actions
among local private and public trading and transport-related communities,
replicated at national and regional levels.
* The opinions expressed in
this summary are those of its author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the UNCTAD secretariat.
** The opinions expressed in
this linked website are those of its web-author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect those of the UNCTAD secretariat.
|